The Dark Side of BluSky: Is This Prop Firm a Scam?

BluSky

Introduction

In recent years, proprietary trading firms (prop firms) have become increasingly popular among retail traders seeking capital access and trading opportunities. BluSky emerged as one of many such firms, promising traders substantial funding and profitable trading conditions. However, mounting complaints and concerning patterns have raised serious questions about the firm’s legitimacy and operations.

As the retail trading industry expands, traders must exercise heightened caution when selecting prop firms. This comprehensive review examines the growing concerns surrounding BluSky and analyzes whether traders should trust this platform with their time and money.

Red Flags That Make BluSky Suspicious

Misleading Advertising and Unrealistic Claims

BluSky’s marketing materials paint an enticing picture of easy funding and rapid account growth. Their advertisements frequently highlight “guaranteed funding” and “instant approval” programs that seem too good to be true. Traders report a stark contrast between these promises and reality.

Many traders have documented cases where BluSky’s advertised funding terms changed after they began their challenge programs. While the firm promotes straightforward scaling programs, users report encountering numerous undisclosed requirements and restrictions that make scaling nearly impossible.

The firm’s profit-sharing arrangements also raise eyebrows. While competitors typically offer transparent profit splits ranging from 70-90%, BluSky’s terms often include various deductions and conditions that significantly reduce actual trader earnings. These details are frequently buried in fine print or only revealed after significant investment of time and money.

Confusing and Unfair Trading Rules

One of the most prevalent complaints against BluSky involves their trading rules and restrictions. Traders report experiencing:

  • Extremely tight drawdown limits that trigger immediate account termination
  • Unclear position sizing requirements that change without notice
  • Arbitrary restrictions on trading during major news events
  • Inconsistent enforcement of rules across different traders

The firm’s drawdown calculations particularly stand out as problematic. While advertising standard daily and maximum drawdown limits, traders report accounts being terminated for much smaller drawdowns than specified. The firm often cites obscure calculation methods that weren’t clearly communicated during registration.

Many traders have lost substantial evaluation fees due to these unclear rules. When questioned about these practices, BluSky typically refers to broad terms and conditions that give them significant discretion in interpreting and enforcing rules.

Poor Customer Support & Delayed Responses

Quality customer support is crucial for prop firms, as traders often need quick responses to technical issues or rule clarifications. BluSky’s support system has been widely criticized for:

  • Extremely slow response times, often exceeding several weeks
  • Generic automated responses that don’t address specific concerns
  • Lack of live chat or phone support options
  • Missing or inadequate documentation for common issues

Traders report that support becomes particularly unresponsive when dealing with payout requests or account termination disputes. This pattern suggests potential systemic issues in the firm’s operations and raises questions about their commitment to trader success.

Trader Complaints & Negative Reviews

Withdrawals and Payout Issues

The most serious allegations against BluSky involve their handling of withdrawals and payouts. Numerous traders have reported:

  • Accounts being terminated shortly before or after requesting withdrawals
  • Additional verification requirements introduced during payout processing
  • Extended delays in processing legitimate withdrawal requests
  • Sudden rule violations being cited to deny payouts

These experiences follow a concerning pattern: traders successfully complete challenges and begin profitable trading, only to encounter obstacles when attempting to withdraw earnings. While some delays in processing payments are normal in the industry, the frequency and nature of BluSky’s payout issues suggest potential structural problems.

Fake Positive Reviews to Cover Up Complaints

Investigation into BluSky’s online presence reveals suspicious patterns in their review profile:

  • Multiple positive reviews sharing similar writing styles and specific phrases
  • Reviews from accounts with no other trading-related activity
  • Rapid appearance of positive reviews following negative feedback
  • Aggressive management of their online reputation through review removal

These practices raise questions about the authenticity of positive feedback and suggest a coordinated effort to manage the firm’s online reputation rather than address underlying issues.

Should You Trust BluSky?

Given the numerous red flags and consistent patterns of complaints, traders should exercise extreme caution when considering BluSky. Several factors make it difficult to recommend this firm:

  1. Lack of Regulatory Oversight
  • No clear regulatory status or oversight
  • Limited corporate transparency
  • Unclear protection for trader funds
  1. Operational Concerns
  • Inconsistent rule enforcement
  • Poor communication practices
  • Problematic withdrawal processes
  1. Industry Reputation
  • Growing number of documented complaints
  • Questionable marketing practices
  • Suspicious review patterns

Alternative prop firms with stronger reputations and clearer track records exist in the market. Established firms like FTMO, True Forex Funds, and The 5%ers offer more transparent terms and consistent track records of paying traders.

Conclusion

While definitively labeling any firm a “scam” requires careful consideration, the evidence suggests that BluSky exhibits numerous concerning practices that should give traders pause. The combination of misleading marketing, unclear rules, poor support, and problematic payouts creates a risk profile that most traders should avoid.

To protect themselves from potentially fraudulent prop firms, traders should:

  1. Research thoroughly before committing funds
  • Check multiple independent review sources
  • Verify regulatory status and corporate information
  • Contact existing traders if possible
  1. Document everything
  • Save all communication with the firm
  • Record trading conditions and rule changes
  • Keep detailed records of account activity
  1. Start small
  • Test with minimum deposits first
  • Verify withdrawal processes before scaling
  • Monitor rule enforcement and support responsiveness

The prop trading industry offers legitimate opportunities for skilled traders, but it also attracts questionable operators. Traders must remain vigilant and prioritize firms with established reputations and transparent operations. While BluSky may appeal to some with its attractive marketing, the documented issues suggest traders would be wise to consider more reputable alternatives.

about The Firm ​
BluSky-logo

BluSky

BluSky presents itself as a hassle-free trading platform with no activation fees and daily payouts, but this oversimplifies the reality. Traders face stringent profit goals, such as needing to earn $1,500 on a $25,000 account, alongside strict trailing drawdown limits. This creates immense pressure, often leading to reckless trading decisions. Their claims of community support through a “free Discord chatroom” and “1-on-1 coaching” may feel superficial and fail to provide the necessary guidance. Ultimately, while BluSky markets itself as supportive, the high-stress environment and unrealistic expectations could leave traders feeling overwhelmed and isolated.

View More in BluSky

More Posts You Might Like

DNA Funded

DNA Funded Disappointment: When Ambitions Fail to Deliver

DNA Funded burst onto the prop trading scene with promises that seemed almost too good to be true. Touted as a cutting‐edge, broker‐backed prop firm, DNA Funded promised traders access to significant capital, low fees,...

continue reading >>

Alpicap

The Alpicap Illusion: When Promises Don’t Match the Reality

Introduction Alpicap, a Swiss-based prop firm, presents an enticing vision: access to substantial capital, favorable trading conditions, and a supportive environment, all designed to help traders achieve financial success. However, this image clashes with the...

continue reading >>

Alpicap

Alpicap Under Fire: Exposing Questionable Trading Tactics

Introduction Alpicap, a Swiss-based proprietary trading firm, markets itself as a gateway to financial freedom with promises of high profit splits, flexible funding, and institutional-grade tools. However, beneath its polished image, traders report friction with...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

The Funded Top Controversy: How Promises Disappoint Real Traders

Introduction Funded Top, a proprietary trading firm offering capital to forex and crypto traders, has faced growing criticism for allegedly misleading promises. While marketing itself as a pathway to financial freedom, traders report systemic issues...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

Unmasking Funded Top: When Bold Claims Fall Short

The trading industry is no stranger to grand promises, but Funded Top has distinguished itself with particularly bold claims. Their marketing materials paint a picture of unprecedented opportunity: instant access to massive trading capital, generous...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

Funded Top Fiasco: The Unspoken Truth Behind Their Model

The world of funded trading has seen its share of enticing promises, but few have captured attention quite like Funded Top. With its bold claims of generous leverage and easy capital access, the platform has...

continue reading >>