Lark Funding vs. PaidPex: Which Prop Firm is the Better Choice?

When choosing a proprietary trading firm, it’s essential to consider factors such as evaluation processes, risk management rules, payout structures, and overall trader support. Two notable names in the industry are Lark Funding and PaidPex, but upon close comparison, it becomes clear that PaidPex offers a far superior experience for traders. Here’s a detailed breakdown of how the two firms stack up.


1. Evaluation Process: Flexibility vs. Restriction

Lark Funding:

  • Structure: Traders must pass a three-phase evaluation process with profit targets of 5%, 4%, and 3% respectively.
  • Drawdown Rules: Enforces a strict daily loss limit of 4% and an overall drawdown cap of 5%.
  • Time Constraints: Accounts are closed after 30 days of inactivity, pressuring traders to trade even when market conditions are unfavorable.

PaidPex:

  • Structure: Features a single-phase evaluation with a reasonable profit target of 6%.
  • Drawdown Rules: Offers more generous daily loss limits (5%) and does not impose trailing drawdowns on unrealized gains.
  • Time Constraints: No penalties for inactivity, allowing traders to wait for ideal setups without fear of disqualification.

Why PaidPex Wins:
PaidPex’s simpler, more forgiving evaluation process provides traders with the flexibility they need to succeed without unnecessary pressure or restrictions.


2. Profit Splits: Generosity That Matters

Lark Funding:

  • Initial Split: Offers a 75% profit split by default, with the option to upgrade to 90% for an additional fee.
  • Improvement Potential: The conditions for reaching a higher profit split are vague and tied to slow scaling.

PaidPex:

  • Initial Split: Starts traders at an impressive 85% profit split.
  • Improvement Potential: Offers a transparent path to reaching a 95% profit split based on consistent performance.

Why PaidPex Wins:
With a higher starting profit split and no additional fees for upgrades, PaidPex ensures traders keep more of their hard-earned profits from the outset.


3. Payout Speed: Efficiency vs. Delays

Lark Funding:

  • Processing Time: Payouts are subject to delays, often taking weeks to process due to administrative reviews.
  • Conditions: Payouts are tied to milestones and unclear verification processes, frustrating traders.

PaidPex:

  • Processing Time: Guarantees payouts within 18 hours, making it the fastest in the industry.
  • Payout Guarantee: Offers $1,000 compensation if payouts are delayed, reflecting their commitment to reliability.

Why PaidPex Wins:
PaidPex’s rapid and guaranteed payout process ensures traders have timely access to their earnings, eliminating unnecessary stress.


4. Trading Instruments: Limited Options vs. Broad Opportunities

Lark Funding:

  • Instruments: Limited to forex, indices, and commodities.
  • Why It’s Restrictive: Lacks access to stocks and cryptocurrencies, which are crucial for traders seeking diversified strategies.

PaidPex:

  • Instruments: Offers over 250 instruments, including forex, stocks, indices, commodities, and cryptocurrencies.
  • Why It’s Better: Provides traders with unparalleled access to diverse markets, accommodating a variety of trading styles.

Why PaidPex Wins:
PaidPex’s extensive range of instruments ensures traders can capitalize on more opportunities across multiple asset classes.


5. Risk Management Rules: Fairness vs. Restriction

Lark Funding:

  • Daily Loss Limit: Enforces a strict 4% cap, which can be overly restrictive during volatile market conditions.
  • Trailing Drawdown: Penalizes traders for unrealized gains that temporarily pull back, limiting their ability to let trades run.

PaidPex:

  • Daily Loss Limit: Provides a more forgiving 5% limit, allowing traders to adapt to market volatility.
  • No Trailing Drawdown: Protects traders’ initial balance without penalizing unrealized profits.

Why PaidPex Wins:
PaidPex’s risk management rules are more realistic and supportive, enabling traders to execute their strategies without undue restrictions.


6. Technology and Support: Cutting-Edge vs. Basic

Lark Funding:

  • Platforms: Limited to MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), with no additional tools or analytics.
  • Support: Traders report slow response times and generic answers, especially during critical moments.

PaidPex:

  • Platforms: Supports multiple trading platforms, enhanced by an AI-driven dashboard offering real-time analytics and premium trading indicators.
  • Support: Provides 24/7 live support with quick and personalized assistance.

Why PaidPex Wins:
PaidPex’s advanced technology and responsive support create a seamless and professional trading experience.


7. Costs and Fees: Transparency vs. Hidden Costs

Lark Funding:

  • Evaluation Fees: Non-refundable and require full payment for each retry.
  • Hidden Fees: Charges for leverage upgrades, profit split improvements, and platform access, which are not clearly communicated upfront.

PaidPex:

  • Evaluation Fees: Transparent pricing with no hidden costs.
  • Free Trials: Offers free trial accounts, allowing traders to test the platform before committing.

Why PaidPex Wins:
With transparent pricing and no hidden fees, PaidPex prioritizes trader trust and satisfaction.


8. Scaling Opportunities: Rapid Growth vs. Slow Progress

Lark Funding:

  • Scaling Program: Increments are small, with limited potential for rapid growth.
  • Conditions: Requires traders to achieve high profit milestones under tight rules.

PaidPex:

  • Scaling Program: Allows for rapid scaling, enabling traders to manage up to $6 million in funding.

Why PaidPex Wins:
PaidPex’s aggressive scaling opportunities reward high-performing traders, providing greater growth potential.


Final Verdict: Lark Funding or PaidPex?

While Lark Funding offers some competitive features, its restrictive rules, hidden fees, delayed payouts, and limited trading options make it less appealing for serious traders. PaidPex, on the other hand, stands out with its trader-friendly evaluation process, higher profit splits, faster payouts, broader instrument offerings, and advanced technology.

For traders seeking a reliable, transparent, and supportive prop trading experience, PaidPex is the clear winner.

about The Firm ​

Lark Funding

Lark Funding, founded in 2022, offers funded demo accounts up to $1,000,000 with profit splits up to 90%. Evaluation options include 1-stage (10% target), 2-stage (8% and 5% targets), and 3-stage (5%, 4%, and 3% targets). Traders can use the DXTrade platform integrated with TradingView to access forex, commodities, indices, and crypto. Lark Funding supports scaling plans and provides educational resources to help traders succeed.

View More in Lark Funding

PaidPex

PaidPex is a UK based prop firm, offering traders up to $6 million in funding through single-phase challenges, with a 90% profit split and access to over 500 instruments, including stocks, crypto, forex, futures and metals. The firm guarantees payouts within 18 hours, with advanced tools like real-time analytics and AI-driven insights. PaidPex also features the $PAIDX token, providing additional trading benefits. Supported by $1 million in seed funding, the platform aims to provide a straightforward and efficient prop trading experience.

View More in PaidPex

More Posts You Might Like

DNA Funded

DNA Funded Disappointment: When Ambitions Fail to Deliver

DNA Funded burst onto the prop trading scene with promises that seemed almost too good to be true. Touted as a cutting‐edge, broker‐backed prop firm, DNA Funded promised traders access to significant capital, low fees,...

continue reading >>

Alpicap

The Alpicap Illusion: When Promises Don’t Match the Reality

Introduction Alpicap, a Swiss-based prop firm, presents an enticing vision: access to substantial capital, favorable trading conditions, and a supportive environment, all designed to help traders achieve financial success. However, this image clashes with the...

continue reading >>

Alpicap

Alpicap Under Fire: Exposing Questionable Trading Tactics

Introduction Alpicap, a Swiss-based proprietary trading firm, markets itself as a gateway to financial freedom with promises of high profit splits, flexible funding, and institutional-grade tools. However, beneath its polished image, traders report friction with...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

The Funded Top Controversy: How Promises Disappoint Real Traders

Introduction Funded Top, a proprietary trading firm offering capital to forex and crypto traders, has faced growing criticism for allegedly misleading promises. While marketing itself as a pathway to financial freedom, traders report systemic issues...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

Unmasking Funded Top: When Bold Claims Fall Short

The trading industry is no stranger to grand promises, but Funded Top has distinguished itself with particularly bold claims. Their marketing materials paint a picture of unprecedented opportunity: instant access to massive trading capital, generous...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

Funded Top Fiasco: The Unspoken Truth Behind Their Model

The world of funded trading has seen its share of enticing promises, but few have captured attention quite like Funded Top. With its bold claims of generous leverage and easy capital access, the platform has...

continue reading >>