Finotive Funding vs. PaidPex: A Detailed Comparison

When comparing proprietary trading firms, it’s important to examine their offerings, rules, and trader experiences to determine which aligns best with your needs. Finotive Funding and PaidPex are two notable firms in this space, each providing distinct features for traders seeking funded accounts. This detailed comparison highlights their similarities and differences while offering insights into what each prop trading firm brings to the table.


1. Evaluation Process

Finotive Funding

  • Two-Step Evaluation Process:
    • Phase 1: 7.5% profit target with a maximum daily drawdown of 5% and an overall drawdown of 10%.
    • Phase 2: 5% profit target under the same risk parameters.
  • Instant Funding Option: Offers direct funding without an evaluation but imposes stricter drawdown limits (5%-10% daily and 8%-16% overall).

PaidPex

  • One-Phase Evaluation:
    • Traders must achieve an 8% profit target with no minimum trading days and a maximum drawdown limit of 10%.
  • Flexible Timeline: No time limits, reducing pressure on traders to meet profit targets within short periods.
  • Instant Funding: Provides direct access to trading capital without a challenge, with risk parameters similar to those in evaluation accounts.

Key Difference:
PaidPex offers a simpler and more streamlined one-phase evaluation process, reducing the time and stress involved in qualifying for a funded account.


2. Profit Splits

Finotive Funding

  • Profit splits range from 55% to 95%, depending on the account type and performance.
  • Instant funding accounts may have lower initial splits compared to evaluated accounts.

PaidPex

  • Profit splits start at 85% for all funded accounts, with the potential to increase to 90% for consistent performance.
  • The payout structure applies uniformly, whether traders use instant funding or pass the evaluation process.

Key Difference:
PaidPex provides a higher starting profit split, ensuring traders retain more of their earnings from the outset.


3. Payouts

Finotive Funding

  • Payouts are available on demand for Instant Funding accounts and after meeting profit criteria in evaluation accounts.
  • Some traders have reported delays in withdrawal processing.

PaidPex

  • Payouts are processed within 18 hours, among the fastest in the industry.
  • Traders can request withdrawals at any time, with a clear and transparent process.

Key Difference:
PaidPex’s commitment to fast and reliable payouts ensures traders can access their earnings quickly, enhancing trust and financial planning.


4. Risk Management Rules

Finotive Funding

  • Daily Drawdown: 5%-10% depending on account type.
  • Overall Drawdown: 8%-16%, with strict adherence to predefined risk limits.
  • Total Risk Rule: Limits open trade risk to 50% of the daily drawdown limit, particularly for instant funding accounts.

PaidPex

  • Daily Drawdown: Set at 5%, consistent across all account types.
  • Overall Drawdown: 10%, with no additional restrictions on open trades.
  • Flexibility: Risk management rules are designed to allow traders greater flexibility without unnecessary penalties.

Key Difference:
PaidPex’s straightforward and less restrictive rules provide traders with more room to implement diverse strategies without fear of breaching limits.


5. Trading Platforms and Instruments

Finotive Funding

  • Provides access to MetaTrader 5 (MT5) but does not support MetaTrader 4 (MT4).
  • Offers a wide range of instruments, including forex, indices, commodities, and cryptocurrencies.

PaidPex

  • Supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4), MetaTrader 5 (MT5), and custom-built platforms with advanced analytics tools.
  • Includes an extensive selection of tradable assets, such as forex pairs, stocks, indices, metals, and cryptocurrencies.

Key Difference:
PaidPex offers more platform options and additional tools, catering to traders who prefer MT4 or need advanced analytics.


6. Transparency and Support

Finotive Funding

  • Some traders have reported challenges with delayed customer support responses and unclear explanations of account terminations.
  • Transparency around certain rules, such as profit-sharing or scaling criteria, could be improved.

PaidPex

  • Known for responsive and helpful customer support, with 24/7 availability.
  • Policies and rules are clearly outlined, ensuring traders understand their obligations and opportunities from the start.

Key Difference:
PaidPex’s transparent policies and reliable support make it easier for traders to focus on trading without unnecessary administrative hurdles.


7. Scaling Plans

Finotive Funding

  • Offers scaling opportunities, allowing accounts to grow to a maximum of $3.2 million, but specific performance criteria are not always clearly defined.

PaidPex

  • Provides a structured scaling plan, increasing account sizes by 25% every three months for consistent performers.
  • Scaling criteria are clearly outlined, ensuring traders know what is required to grow their accounts.

Key Difference:
PaidPex’s transparent and structured scaling plan gives traders a clearer path to account growth.


8. Reputation and Community Feedback

Finotive Funding

  • As a newer firm, Finotive Funding is still building its reputation. While some traders praise its offerings, others have raised concerns about delays and transparency issues.

PaidPex

  • Backed by a team with extensive experience in proprietary trading and positive community feedback.
  • Known for its innovative use of technology, including AI tools for traders.

Key Difference:
PaidPex’s established reputation and trader-friendly approach provide added confidence for those seeking a reliable prop trading partner.


Conclusion

Both Finotive Funding and PaidPex offer unique opportunities for traders, but their approaches differ significantly. Finotive Funding focuses on structured risk management and multiple account options, which may appeal to traders who prefer rigid systems. PaidPex, on the other hand, provides a more flexible and trader-friendly experience with streamlined evaluations, higher profit splits, faster payouts, and transparent policies.

While both firms cater to different preferences, traders seeking simplicity, reliability, and fast results may find PaidPex to be a more practical choice. Ultimately, the decision depends on your trading style, risk tolerance, and personal priorities.

about The Firm ​

Finotive Funding

Finotive Funding is a proprietary trading firm offering account sizes from $2,500 to $200,000, with funding options including Classic and One-Step Challenges, as well as Instant Funding for immediate trading. Traders can earn up to 95% profit splits and scale accounts to $3.2 million based on performance. They support trading on MT4 with leverage up to 1:400, covering forex, commodities, indices, and crypto. Finotive provides educational resources, a performance dashboard, and active trader communities, making it a strong choice for aspiring traders.

View More in Finotive Funding

PaidPex

PaidPex is a UK based prop firm, offering traders up to $6 million in funding through single-phase challenges, with a 90% profit split and access to over 500 instruments, including stocks, crypto, forex, futures and metals. The firm guarantees payouts within 18 hours, with advanced tools like real-time analytics and AI-driven insights. PaidPex also features the $PAIDX token, providing additional trading benefits. Supported by $1 million in seed funding, the platform aims to provide a straightforward and efficient prop trading experience.

View More in PaidPex

More Posts You Might Like

DNA Funded

DNA Funded Disappointment: When Ambitions Fail to Deliver

DNA Funded burst onto the prop trading scene with promises that seemed almost too good to be true. Touted as a cutting‐edge, broker‐backed prop firm, DNA Funded promised traders access to significant capital, low fees,...

continue reading >>

Alpicap

The Alpicap Illusion: When Promises Don’t Match the Reality

Introduction Alpicap, a Swiss-based prop firm, presents an enticing vision: access to substantial capital, favorable trading conditions, and a supportive environment, all designed to help traders achieve financial success. However, this image clashes with the...

continue reading >>

Alpicap

Alpicap Under Fire: Exposing Questionable Trading Tactics

Introduction Alpicap, a Swiss-based proprietary trading firm, markets itself as a gateway to financial freedom with promises of high profit splits, flexible funding, and institutional-grade tools. However, beneath its polished image, traders report friction with...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

The Funded Top Controversy: How Promises Disappoint Real Traders

Introduction Funded Top, a proprietary trading firm offering capital to forex and crypto traders, has faced growing criticism for allegedly misleading promises. While marketing itself as a pathway to financial freedom, traders report systemic issues...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

Unmasking Funded Top: When Bold Claims Fall Short

The trading industry is no stranger to grand promises, but Funded Top has distinguished itself with particularly bold claims. Their marketing materials paint a picture of unprecedented opportunity: instant access to massive trading capital, generous...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

Funded Top Fiasco: The Unspoken Truth Behind Their Model

The world of funded trading has seen its share of enticing promises, but few have captured attention quite like Funded Top. With its bold claims of generous leverage and easy capital access, the platform has...

continue reading >>