Apex Trader Funding vs. FundedNext: A Comprehensive Comparison

Apex Trader Funding vs. FundedNext

Apex Trader Funding and FundedNext are two well-known proprietary trading firms offering traders access to capital after completing their respective evaluation processes. While both firms aim to support traders, their approaches, offerings, and conditions differ significantly. This detailed comparison highlights their features, evaluation rules, platforms, and other key considerations to help traders choose the firm that best suits their trading style.


1. Overview of the Firms

Apex Trader Funding

  • Founded: 2021
  • Headquarters: Austin, Texas, USA
  • Specialization: Futures trading
  • Mission: Designed to be trader-friendly, offering a straightforward evaluation process with minimal restrictions to help traders succeed.

FundedNext

  • Founded: 2022
  • Headquarters: Ajman, UAE
  • Specialization: Forex and CFDs
  • Mission: Focused on empowering traders globally with flexible programs and scaling opportunities, catering to both experienced and novice traders.

2. Evaluation Programs

Apex Trader Funding

  • Program Type: One-step evaluation.
  • Profit Target: 6% of the account balance.
  • Trailing Drawdown: Dynamic, starting at 6% and reducing based on equity highs.
  • Minimum Trading Days: No minimum requirement.
  • Maximum Trading Days: Unlimited, allowing traders to take their time.
  • Profit Split: Traders retain 90% of profits.
  • Account Sizes: Available accounts range from $25,000 to $300,000.

FundedNext

  • Program Types:
    • One-Step Evaluation:
      • Profit Target: Ranges from 10% to 25%, depending on the chosen program.
      • Maximum Drawdown: Ranges from 6% to 10%.
      • Minimum Trading Days: As low as 2, depending on the program.
      • Maximum Trading Days: Varies by account size and program, offering flexibility.
      • Profit Split: Starts at 60%, with the potential to increase to 90%.
    • Two-Step Evaluation:
      • Phase 1: Profit Target: 8% to 10%, with a maximum loss of 10%.
      • Phase 2: Profit Target: 4% to 5%, with similar drawdown and loss rules.
      • Minimum Trading Days: 5 per phase.
      • Maximum Trading Days: 20 to 60, offering time for measured performance.

Key Differences:

  • Apex Trader Funding’s one-step process is simpler and has no time constraints, appealing to traders who want flexibility.
  • FundedNext’s two-step program is more rigorous but provides multiple evaluation paths tailored to different trader goals.

3. Account Sizes and Fees

Apex Trader Funding

  • Account Sizes: Offers accounts ranging from $25,000 to $300,000.
  • Evaluation Fees: Range from $147 to $657, depending on account size.

FundedNext

  • Account Sizes: Offers accounts from $6,000 to $200,000.
  • Evaluation Fees: Range from $49 to $1,099, depending on the program and account size.

Key Differences:

  • Apex focuses on larger account sizes, while FundedNext offers smaller accounts, catering to traders with varying budgets.
  • FundedNext’s smaller evaluation fees for lower accounts make it accessible to novice traders.

4. Trading Instruments

Apex Trader Funding

  • Instruments: Specializes in futures trading, including:
    • Equity indices
    • Forex futures
    • Commodities (metals, agricultural products, and energy)
    • Cryptocurrencies

FundedNext

  • Instruments: Focuses on CFDs, including:
    • Forex
    • Indices
    • Metals
    • Commodities
    • Stocks
    • Cryptocurrencies

Key Differences:

  • Apex caters exclusively to futures traders, while FundedNext provides broader access to CFDs, making it better suited for traders looking for a diverse range of instruments.

5. Trading Platforms

Apex Trader Funding

  • Platforms:
    • NinjaTrader: Known for its advanced tools and charting capabilities.
    • Tradovate: A modern, cloud-based trading platform.
    • TradingView: Offers powerful charting and technical analysis features.
    • R|Trader Pro: Provides professional-grade trading tools for futures traders.

FundedNext

  • Platforms:
    • MetaTrader 4 (MT4): The most popular trading platform globally.
    • MetaTrader 5 (MT5): A more advanced version with additional features.
    • TradingView: Offers excellent charting for analysis.
    • Match-Trader and DXTrade: Provide unique trading experiences for advanced users.

Key Differences:

  • Apex’s platform selection is tailored to futures trading, while FundedNext offers industry-standard platforms like MT4 and MT5 for forex and CFD traders.

6. Leverage

Apex Trader Funding

  • Leverage: Futures leverage typically operates at 1:1, as futures trading involves inherent leverage.

FundedNext

  • Leverage:
    • Forex: Up to 1:100
    • Indices and Metals: Up to 1:50
    • Commodities: Up to 1:50
    • Cryptocurrencies: Up to 1:2

Key Differences:

  • FundedNext’s leverage levels offer greater flexibility for traders in forex and CFDs compared to Apex’s inherent futures leverage.

7. Trading Styles and Flexibility

Apex Trader Funding

  • Allowed: Scalping, swing trading, day trading, and use of automated systems (EAs, bots).
  • Restrictions: Minimal; allows trading during news events and overnight/weekend positions.

FundedNext

  • Allowed: Scalping, swing trading, day trading, and automated systems.
  • Restrictions: Prohibits news trading, which may limit some strategies.

Key Differences:

  • Apex’s unrestricted environment allows for greater strategy diversity, while FundedNext’s news trading restriction may deter some traders.

8. Payouts

Apex Trader Funding

  • Profit Split:
    • Traders retain 100% of the first $25,000 in profits.
    • Beyond $25,000, a 90% profit split applies.
  • Payout Frequency: Payouts can be requested as early as 10 trading days.

FundedNext

  • Profit Split:
    • Ranges from 60% to 90%, depending on the program and trader performance.
  • Payout Frequency: Monthly payouts, with early withdrawals available under specific conditions.

Key Differences:

  • Apex’s initial 100% profit retention is more attractive for immediate earnings.
  • FundedNext’s payout flexibility increases with better performance.

9. Scaling Opportunities

Apex Trader Funding

  • Offers scaling opportunities but does not provide a structured scaling plan beyond $300,000.

FundedNext

  • Provides a structured scaling plan allowing traders to grow accounts up to $4,000,000.

Key Differences:

  • FundedNext’s clear scaling plan appeals to traders with long-term growth goals.

Conclusion

Both Apex Trader Funding and FundedNext offer unique advantages, catering to different types of traders.

Choose Apex Trader Funding if:

  • Futures trading is your specialty.
  • A one-step evaluation with no time limits suits your style.
  • Flexibility and minimal restrictions align with your trading goals.

Opt for FundedNext if:

  • Forex and CFDs are your primary focus.
  • You seek structured scaling plans and access to MT4/MT5.
  • Lower-cost options for smaller accounts meet your needs.

Each firm has its strengths, and the best choice depends on your trading style, instrument preference, and long-term goals.

about The Firm ​

Apex Trader Funding

Apex Trader Funding, founded in 2021 in Austin, Texas, is a leading futures-focused prop firm. They offer funding from $25,000 to $300,000 with a one-step evaluation. Traders keep 100% of the first $25,000 in profits and 90% thereafter. The firm supports platforms like NinjaTrader and TradingView and is known for quick payouts, averaging $7 million monthly. Apex has paid over $100 million to traders, emphasizing flexibility and trader success.

View More in Apex Trader Funding

FundedNext

FundedNext, founded in 2022 in Dubai, offers funded accounts from $6,000 to $200,000, scalable up to $4 million, with profit splits up to 95%. Evaluation options include two-step (10% and 5% targets) and one-step (25% target) models. Traders can use MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView to trade forex, commodities, indices, and crypto. FundedNext supports trader growth with educational resources, coaching, and a community, making it a top choice for funding.

View More in FundedNext

More Posts You Might Like

DNA Funded

DNA Funded Disappointment: When Ambitions Fail to Deliver

DNA Funded burst onto the prop trading scene with promises that seemed almost too good to be true. Touted as a cutting‐edge, broker‐backed prop firm, DNA Funded promised traders access to significant capital, low fees,...

continue reading >>

Alpicap

The Alpicap Illusion: When Promises Don’t Match the Reality

Introduction Alpicap, a Swiss-based prop firm, presents an enticing vision: access to substantial capital, favorable trading conditions, and a supportive environment, all designed to help traders achieve financial success. However, this image clashes with the...

continue reading >>

Alpicap

Alpicap Under Fire: Exposing Questionable Trading Tactics

Introduction Alpicap, a Swiss-based proprietary trading firm, markets itself as a gateway to financial freedom with promises of high profit splits, flexible funding, and institutional-grade tools. However, beneath its polished image, traders report friction with...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

The Funded Top Controversy: How Promises Disappoint Real Traders

Introduction Funded Top, a proprietary trading firm offering capital to forex and crypto traders, has faced growing criticism for allegedly misleading promises. While marketing itself as a pathway to financial freedom, traders report systemic issues...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

Unmasking Funded Top: When Bold Claims Fall Short

The trading industry is no stranger to grand promises, but Funded Top has distinguished itself with particularly bold claims. Their marketing materials paint a picture of unprecedented opportunity: instant access to massive trading capital, generous...

continue reading >>

Funded Top

Funded Top

Funded Top Fiasco: The Unspoken Truth Behind Their Model

The world of funded trading has seen its share of enticing promises, but few have captured attention quite like Funded Top. With its bold claims of generous leverage and easy capital access, the platform has...

continue reading >>